Gender Inclusive Classic Slip-On Sneaker

Pink checker vans were nice, loved the pink but they weren't as comfortable as I thought they would have.

These are very comfortable and stylish shoes. I love them! The color is a big darker than the picture, but it is OK for me. They go with everything!

I have worn Vans every day for many years, usually until they wear out. I don’t understand why Vans shoes have become so narrow. They are no longer comfortable or accommodating for people with wide feet. I recently bought two pairs of Classic Slip-Ons. One pair was narrow, and the other was extremely narrow. I returned the extremely narrow pair, but I regret not returning both. The pair I kept hurts my feet, so I don’t want to wear them.

Had to return because it is nothing like the picture. The color is so much darker, almost like a dark brown. So disappointed!

Such a great “neutral” shoe. They’re very comfortable.

I bought these because I wanted to try a "normal" pair of vans slip-ons without the popcush insoles. They fit fine and they don't scratch my heel. The description says the top is "suede" but it feels like I'm just wearing rubber all around. They're not breathable. When I wore them for the first time it felt like my feet were getting friction burns even though I was just sitting down and not moving at all. I know vans are "supposed" to be unisex, but the search filters sort this into "women's" shoes, and I bought them without knowing that, and I'm a man, and I feel embarrassed and confused and paranoid that I wore them in public at all. Image search results show this pair of shoes' title saying "Vans Classic Checkerboard Womens Slip-On Shoes" but nothing on the actual page (besides a picture of a woman wearing them) indicates they're women's shoes. The box shows they came in shows the "men's" size on the outside, but not the women's size. The inside of the shoe shows both men's and women's sizes. Very confusing.